Skip to content
← Lab

Wind tunnel

Change the shape and angle of an airfoil, then watch the flow respond. Explore how pressure and lift change together.

Local speed / freestream
0.25×1×2×

Set the flow

Raise or lower the leading edge.

78 knots in this example.

Maximum mean-line height, as a fraction of chord.

Try a comparison
Section lift coefficient
0.87Cₗ
Lift per meter of span
854N/m
Air density
1.225kg/m³

Two-dimensional ideal flow · 1 m chord · incompressible air

Surface pressure

Upper surface Lower surface
-2-0.5100.250.50.751CₚPosition along chord, x/c

Negative Cₚ means pressure below the freestream value.

What to notice

Start with the symmetric airfoil at zero angle. Its upper and lower pressure distributions match, so the net lift is zero.

Add camber or increase the angle of attack. The pressure distribution changes, and the force no longer cancels. Doubling the speed multiplies the predicted lift by four.

The flow is computed with a Joukowski transformation and the Kutta condition. The lift readout and pressure plot come from the same solution.

The model

This experiment maps flow around a circle into flow around an airfoil using the Joukowski transformation. The Kutta condition sets the circulation so the flow leaves the sharp trailing edge smoothly.

Surface pressure follows from the local velocity through Bernoulli’s equation. Lift per unit span follows from the Kutta–Joukowsky theorem. The airfoil’s chord is fixed at one meter, and the air density is fixed at 1.225 kg/m³.

What it leaves out

This is a steady, two-dimensional, inviscid, incompressible solution. It has no boundary layer, flow separation, stall, compressibility, or finite-wing effects. It is useful for exploring ideal flow, rather than predicting the performance of a particular aircraft.

For the underlying ideas, see NASA Glenn’s conformal-mapping explanation and MIT’s Kutta–Joukowsky lecture.